<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Thank You Study: User Feedback in E-mail Thank You Messages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rusq.org/2008/01/05/the-thank-you-study-user-feedback-in-e-mail-thank-you-messages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rusq.org/2008/01/05/the-thank-you-study-user-feedback-in-e-mail-thank-you-messages/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:16:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Reloaded</title>
		<link>http://www.rusq.org/2008/01/05/the-thank-you-study-user-feedback-in-e-mail-thank-you-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Reloaded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rusq.org/test/2008/01/05/the-thank-you-study-user-feedback-in-e-mail-thank-you-messages/#comment-56</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Detailed and precise answers do help the users, whereas a quick reply will not get any responses from the users. This happened with me recently when I filled out an online form to contact a doctor for an aunts treatment. I took out time to write an email, fill out the form and other requirements, whereas the answer I got was that ‘I am unable to understand your request’. The reply looked more like an auto generated response rather than a personl one where the doctor had spent time reviewing the patients submission entry. After reeceiving the response, I never bothered replying back to them, as to me it looked like a waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

